The data, which maps firms convicted of offenses including pigeon-infested properties, faulty fire alarms and leaking lavatories contains no entries from the North East.
The resource shows that none of the 68 recorded offences – involving 57 companies – took place in the North East – with the nearest entries to the North East found in Bradford and Harrogate.
The launch of the database comes as new figures showed the rapid growth of privately rented housing in the UK in recent years. Figures from the EU statistics bureau Eurostat this week showed home ownership levels in the UK to be in “long-term decline”, down by 9.3% since 2005. The figures also suggest that out of the 2.9m homes constructed in the UK between 2000 and 2012, as many as 2.5m are currently being rented out.
Despite the good news for the North East, Ajay Jagota, founder of KIS letting agency, remains concerned about what he calls “revolving door redress schemes”.
Ajay said: “With prosecution only ever being a last resort, this sadly doesn’t mean that North East renters have nothing to worry about, but access to resources like this go at least some of the way towards giving renters peace of mind about their landlords and letting agents.
My concern is that many of the firms listed on the database are still active. One company has been convicted of five offenses, but still appears to be operating like nothing has happened. There don’t seem to be any meaningful consequences for their actions – people are making their tenants lives miserable and getting away with it.
Even worse, where does this leave the newly-launched letting agent redress scheme? You aren’t allowed to operate if you aren’t part of it, so does that mean you still join if you’ve been convicted of putting your tenant’s lives at risk? Do you get kicked out of your redress scheme if you are? Can you just join another redress scheme if that happens? These questions need answers.
The issue is becoming more and more fundamental as more and more people choose renting over buying. A revolving door redress scheme isn’t good enough.”
